No.6324
That's kinda stupid considering the 2nd image of the sticky.
No.6325
I'm sorry
No.6330
>>6328I assume you mean this?
>>6329Must be inadvertent otherwise it's not cute, it's just sluttery
No.6339
So you want /c/ but with the occasional nipple slip? Is that your vision of the board?
No.6340
>>6334it should be cute, but imagesharing naturally trends towards sexyness. The ecchiness needs to be held back sometimes to give the cute stuff some room.
Individual images are not a problem but certain threads such as >>203 >>1377
>>2557 >>2437 >>648 >>737 >>787 are just hentai. The level of standards being put into place here aren't at a good level.
This board hasn't even been following any rules >>1299
No.6341
the flat one is probably fine, it has a theme, but it's kind of on the border. Sharing quality images vs fap images.
>>6339It's an art board which permits nudity. That's what a /c/ board is
No.6345
> - Non Sexual, but nudity is allowed
Basically all that I'm asking here is this rule needs to be enforced more.
> - Kissu with nudity is sex, sex is not ecchi
This one to some extent in situations with yuri.
No.6348
I'm not asking for activity, in fact I'm asking to kill activity by enforcing said rules. But people can still post whatever, I'm not going to ban anyone because of this. It might be better to revise the rules and say that nudity is not explicitly allowed so people post it in spoilers.
No.6350
>>6349
Most of those images(like 80%) are mine, like one or two belong to you. I'm basically asking if it's alright if I delete my own posts and make other people better than my standards in images.
No.6351
If most of the board is already breaking the non enforced rules you might as well remake the board yet again but with stricter rules.
No.6355
>>6352
I'm actually saying that I myself am the one breaking the rules of this board the hardest.
So since they're my threads/posts I'm going to wipe them and in the future enforce standards on newly created threads. These standards need to be better expressed in a revised sticky to make nudity less if the center-point and more of an afterthought.
Arguing if the sticky is good or not can be done on /b/, but for now, just going to delete any of my threads/posts that don't meet my to be announced revisions
No.6357
>>6355What's wrong with having lax rules. iirc the problem with megumi was that you were uncomfortable with legal issues. There is no such thing here, right?
No.6358
>>6350That makes this worse, you're just wanting to change the board into something other than what everyone including you thought the board is supposed to be
Why try to change the direction of the board now? Have you received feedback that the board is not what users have envisioned?
No.6360
>>6357One of the purposes of the remodel was to create a board for sharing nice images with people and not explicitly saying that they have to be sfw. By doing this you remove the sexual purpose of the board, it's for sharing cute pictures.
However, it's been the case that this board is being used for a sexual purpose which defeats the original idea. Perhaps this is the result of including ecchi in the title in which case the board needs to be deleted again, being remade as a cute which doesn't remove nudity.
No.6364
>>6361
Then i have to make some unpleasant mod decisions that discriminate against some users on this site.
No.6366
fine, I'm tired of dealing with people that want a utopia and will just discriminate.
No.6367
if there are legal reasons it needs to change then say so
no need to be coy about it
No.6371
Here is what I am saying. There are 3 routes I can take now.
A - I delete 40-50 images that I consider to be against the rules in the former sticky(now on /trans/), mostly not passing my threshold of what's acceptable lolicon. Begin moderating anything that is too far in the lolicon direction
B - I delete ~100 images that are too far on the side of hentai, begin moderating anything that is too hentai.
C - I delete the board and remake the rules with only a /c/.
Right now I'm saying A
No.6373
>>6371Oh, sexual loli. You should have said that at the beginning.
No.6374
>>6371>loliconsounds like vermin's canadian handlers are striking again
No.6375
excuse me sir that fictional drawing is illegal
No.6376
Setting clear definitions for pornography and erotica is a thing that ought to be done I think, if the old dichotomy of tasteful lewdness and tasteless lewdness has become too uuuh problematic(?) to be kept in place.
No.6377
it's impossible to have a board based around a definition. B is really a non-option. A is getting done either way. It's only really a matter of if people want this board to still exist after I'm done deleting all the files of things that I don't want.
No.6378
While we're talking about moderation stuff, would it be possible to put deletion reasons on /trans/? Usually it's obvious why a post was deleted but not always.
No.6379
typically this will be done by hand as a comment on the deleted post. If it isn't then you can ask why and someone will answer
No.6380
I deleted 95 images
No.6381
moved the thread, nothing more to say other than I'm going to delete anything lolicon that makes me uncomfortable.
No.6382
lol gay
No.6384
My understanding was that /ec/ was supposed to be a pseudo replacement for /megu/. I guess I misunderstood. I'll try to be more conservative with what I share in the future, although I did like having a board to share nice and lewd images.
No.6385
might as well delete the board
No.6388
My hands are tied on this topic. Just treat me as the villain trying to ruin your fun.
No.6404
>- no 2D CP
aaa my kokoro it hurts
No.6405
legal jargon
No.6419
legal jargon varies by country, you at least need a qualifier saying which country
it should read something like "nothing Canada considers CP (includes 2D)"
No.6420
>>6419It allows verm to be more liberal in what he deletes, and not make people feel that they need to search up Canadian law to post.
>>6404only worrying until you see the stuff verm himself likes