[ home / bans / all ] [ qa / jp ] [ spg ] [ f / ec ] [ b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new / tab ]

/b/ - Boson Technology

Also known as Boson /g/

New Reply

Options
Comment
File
Whitelist Token
Spoiler
Password (For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "


[Return] [Bottom] [Catalog]

File:24364995b790bb4644d0bdbbde….jpg (1.18 MB,1700x1950)

 No.6323

There's too much of a trend of girls being posing with nudity. This isn't any one person, but a natural trend of this board being used to share sexy pictures.

I think it defeats the purpose of the cute/sexy hybrid for there to be a lot of girls posing for sexual purpose. I'm reviewing every thread on this board to see what I specifically want to change about the sticky, but in general it seems like a girl posing to show off her stuff is hentai, a girl where her stuff is there is not.

The main difference I'm getting at is likely to be: is the character showing an interest in sex

 No.6324

That's kinda stupid considering the 2nd image of the sticky.

 No.6325

I'm sorry

 No.6326

File:[Serenae] Tropical-Rouge! ….jpg (273.35 KB,1920x1080)

Well, it's cute and ecchi. If people are dumping their artist album there's probably going to be a gravitation towards one side, but it's not necessarily a trend for the board itself

 No.6327

File:4cc3bd547d683b3e85d13298e6….png (2.59 MB,1416x2000)

Which is why I'm changing the sticky.

I don't think the board should be pornographic, just lewd. There are several very safe images(mewkle dreamy or sachiko imagesets ) that don't fit in with the feel and since this board has cute in the title, the cuteness doesn't work against explicit content.

 No.6328

File:[Serenae] Tropical-Rouge! ….jpg (276.13 KB,1920x1080)

Oh, that makes sense.
I'll be more inclined to dump stuff (mine would be cute) once the multi-post image thing is ironed out

 No.6329

File:926f84376f2c8648cde22bf32e….jpg (1.14 MB,1359x1920)

What an annoyingly arbitrary suggestion. You may as well say no nudity and make it /c/. Provoking arousal is the point of ecchi, and thus positions will gravitate towards showing an interest in sex.

In short: Dumb idea

 No.6330

File:2021-03-07 23-25-30.mp4 (1.04 MB,1280x720)

>>6328
I assume you mean this?

>>6329
Must be inadvertent otherwise it's not cute, it's just sluttery

 No.6332

File:__hinatsuru_ai_ryuuou_no_o….jpg (219.83 KB,484x800)

you should take this opportunity to train a neural network to scan and ban any pics that are too lewd

 No.6333

File:[Serenae] Tropical-Rouge! ….jpg (270.83 KB,1920x1080)

>>6330
>I assume you mean this?
Oh, nice. Yeah, that's exactly it. I wasn't able to do that a month ago.

 No.6336

File:this is your picture.png (827.66 KB,884x1248)

>>6331
It's just sexy, the level of quality and artistic expression isn't very high.

 No.6338

File:[MoyaiSubs] Mewkledreamy -….jpg (137.03 KB,1920x1080)

>>6335

 No.6339

So you want /c/ but with the occasional nipple slip? Is that your vision of the board?

 No.6340

>>6334
it should be cute, but imagesharing naturally trends towards sexyness. The ecchiness needs to be held back sometimes to give the cute stuff some room.

Individual images are not a problem but certain threads such as >>203 >>1377 >>2557 >>2437 >>648 >>737 >>787 are just hentai. The level of standards being put into place here aren't at a good level.

This board hasn't even been following any rules >>1299

 No.6341

the flat one is probably fine, it has a theme, but it's kind of on the border. Sharing quality images vs fap images.

>>6339
It's an art board which permits nudity. That's what a /c/ board is

 No.6343

File:EjfWmjhVgAIJWy5.jpg (563.52 KB,2048x2048)

If you want artistic nudity you'd need to make the board more "art" focused in first place. The current demographic of the board is horny posters it seems.

 No.6345

> - Non Sexual, but nudity is allowed
Basically all that I'm asking here is this rule needs to be enforced more.

> - Kissu with nudity is sex, sex is not ecchi
This one to some extent in situations with yuri.

 No.6346

File:[MoyaiSubs] Mewkledreamy -….jpg (236.51 KB,1920x1080)

Ultimately, you can't force people to post cute stuff. I guess a "butt thread" is easier for others to contribute towards than something like a 'cute hat' thread or something, too.
hmmmmm

 No.6347

File:c4530a1228ea0c2ee6e06d2c3a….png (1.2 MB,971x1500)

You should require that cute is mandatory for all images posted here and ecchi is purely optional if you want your point more clear. Your idea of banning sexual isn't good considering it's one of the reason to post such images, also cuteness and sexual can coexist.
All the "problematic" threads you mentioned aren't cute.

 No.6348

I'm not asking for activity, in fact I'm asking to kill activity by enforcing said rules. But people can still post whatever, I'm not going to ban anyone because of this. It might be better to revise the rules and say that nudity is not explicitly allowed so people post it in spoilers.

 No.6350

>>6349
Most of those images(like 80%) are mine, like one or two belong to you. I'm basically asking if it's alright if I delete my own posts and make other people better than my standards in images.

 No.6351

If most of the board is already breaking the non enforced rules you might as well remake the board yet again but with stricter rules.

 No.6355

>>6352
I'm actually saying that I myself am the one breaking the rules of this board the hardest.

So since they're my threads/posts I'm going to wipe them and in the future enforce standards on newly created threads. These standards need to be better expressed in a revised sticky to make nudity less if the center-point and more of an afterthought.

Arguing if the sticky is good or not can be done on /b/, but for now, just going to delete any of my threads/posts that don't meet my to be announced revisions

 No.6357

>>6355
What's wrong with having lax rules. iirc the problem with megumi was that you were uncomfortable with legal issues. There is no such thing here, right?

 No.6358

>>6350
That makes this worse, you're just wanting to change the board into something other than what everyone including you thought the board is supposed to be

Why try to change the direction of the board now? Have you received feedback that the board is not what users have envisioned?

 No.6360

>>6357
One of the purposes of the remodel was to create a board for sharing nice images with people and not explicitly saying that they have to be sfw. By doing this you remove the sexual purpose of the board, it's for sharing cute pictures.

However, it's been the case that this board is being used for a sexual purpose which defeats the original idea. Perhaps this is the result of including ecchi in the title in which case the board needs to be deleted again, being remade as a cute which doesn't remove nudity.

 No.6362

File:d12448a515171a4913666fa85b….jpg (173.3 KB,550x745)

If I had to name a real problem with this board it's that the ecchi images mean I keep the board hidden when I'm not horny, which means that threads that use the board to post cute stuff are effectively hidden from me. What you're proposing now sounds like it would make this even worse.

 No.6364

>>6361
Then i have to make some unpleasant mod decisions that discriminate against some users on this site.

 No.6366

fine, I'm tired of dealing with people that want a utopia and will just discriminate.

 No.6367

if there are legal reasons it needs to change then say so
no need to be coy about it

 No.6370

File:Consider_the_following_Yur….jpg (123.03 KB,1280x720)

Why not just make /e/ and /c/ separate boards, everyone's happy. You get your c in one board away from the e in another board. ウインウイン。

 No.6371

Here is what I am saying. There are 3 routes I can take now.
A - I delete 40-50 images that I consider to be against the rules in the former sticky(now on /trans/), mostly not passing my threshold of what's acceptable lolicon. Begin moderating anything that is too far in the lolicon direction
B - I delete ~100 images that are too far on the side of hentai, begin moderating anything that is too hentai.
C - I delete the board and remake the rules with only a /c/.

Right now I'm saying A

 No.6373

>>6371
Oh, sexual loli. You should have said that at the beginning.

 No.6374

>>6371
>lolicon
sounds like vermin's canadian handlers are striking again

 No.6375

excuse me sir that fictional drawing is illegal

 No.6376

Setting clear definitions for pornography and erotica is a thing that ought to be done I think, if the old dichotomy of tasteful lewdness and tasteless lewdness has become too uuuh problematic(?) to be kept in place.

 No.6377

it's impossible to have a board based around a definition. B is really a non-option. A is getting done either way. It's only really a matter of if people want this board to still exist after I'm done deleting all the files of things that I don't want.

 No.6378

While we're talking about moderation stuff, would it be possible to put deletion reasons on /trans/? Usually it's obvious why a post was deleted but not always.

 No.6379

typically this will be done by hand as a comment on the deleted post. If it isn't then you can ask why and someone will answer

 No.6380

I deleted 95 images

 No.6381

moved the thread, nothing more to say other than I'm going to delete anything lolicon that makes me uncomfortable.

 No.6382

lol gay

 No.6384

My understanding was that /ec/ was supposed to be a pseudo replacement for /megu/. I guess I misunderstood. I'll try to be more conservative with what I share in the future, although I did like having a board to share nice and lewd images.

 No.6385

might as well delete the board

 No.6388

My hands are tied on this topic. Just treat me as the villain trying to ruin your fun.

 No.6404

>- no 2D CP
aaa my kokoro it hurts

 No.6405

legal jargon

 No.6419

legal jargon varies by country, you at least need a qualifier saying which country
it should read something like "nothing Canada considers CP (includes 2D)"

 No.6420

>>6419
It allows verm to be more liberal in what he deletes, and not make people feel that they need to search up Canadian law to post.
>>6404
only worrying until you see the stuff verm himself likes




[Return] [Top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]

[ home / bans / all ] [ qa / jp ] [ spg ] [ f / ec ] [ b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new / tab ]