Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 15:44:26 No. 3150
>>3149 thats why you tick multiple checkboxes
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 16:11:06 No. 3151
IQ according to which test, though? My evaluation used WAIS-IV.
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 17:08:11 No. 3153
Anything higher than that of the person using the term.
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 22:24:14 No. 3154 >>3157
The wide spread of responses indicates that you should not use the term because people will take it to mean almost any IQ level that's not mad scientist.
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 22:31:32 No. 3155
Any IQ lower than mine, which is 125 (tested on various different internet IQ tests over the years) (yeah, I know, I'm pretty smart)
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 22:40:49 No. 3156
voted for everything except the middle
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 22:55:47 No. 3157 >>3160
Took an IQ test when as a kid, to get in an accelerated program at school. It pegged me at 120 or 121. And given my experience with people throughout life that aren't family, I'd say I'm on the upper end of the midwit range because I've come across a lot of "midwits". That probably means I'm a midwit too. So anything between 125-100 seems like a good range, encompassing the midwit-spectrum.
>>3154 I think that's the intent of the word or at least an expected result. A midwit is supposed to be someone that is smarter than average but not a genius.
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 23:11:33 No. 3158 >>3159 >>3172
I've found that the real indicator of midwit-ness is regular use of the word 'midwit'. The vast majority of people I've met who use that term have been these internet dipshits who learn about philosophy from youtube videos.
Anonymous 07/31/23 (Mon) 23:36:23 No. 3159
>>3158 Making regular comments about the intelligence of others is a bad sign in general.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 00:54:18 No. 3160 >>3161 >>3162 >>3164 >>3249
>>3157 >I think that's the intent of the word The intent is to insult people who think they're really smart just because they're not complete idiots, specifically people who criticize art for being shallow when they fail to understand the deeper layer of it. For example, someone who sees past EVA's religious imagery as being random nonsense there to look cool but doesn't understand the emotional issues Shinji is going through would be considered a midwit. It's elitists looking down on plebs who can't appreciate true art, it's not actually about IQ.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 00:58:33 No. 3161
>>3160 iunno i honestly had to look up the word's definition for this thread because in every context i saw it it was interchangeable with idiot/moron/retard/etc
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 01:05:20 No. 3162
>>3160 >plebs who can't appreciate true art I would say that's part of the difference between a genius and an above average intelligence or "smart" person. And the term isn't exclusive to creative endeavors, it's often used in reference to not understanding something on a deeper level. As an example, the "midwit" thinks quantum mechanics is all about probabilities and the "genius" knows it's just algebra.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 01:06:33 No. 3164
>>3160 True enlightenment is having seen Showa Ultraman and knowing about all the imagery and cinematographic techniques Anno took from there.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 01:58:50 No. 3166
This sounds like pseud with extra steps.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 02:05:04 No. 3167
And worse morphology, I should add.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 02:38:44 No. 3169
iq tests are like all about the conversion of language into logic
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 06:46:32 No. 3171
i'm too smart for tests
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 16:47:08 No. 3172 >>3174
I had never heard of this term. Apparently it's some /pol/ meme. Therefore I'm going to have to agree with
>>3158 . By definition the people using it have to be low IQ, so the people they're labeling must be at least 3 billion IQ.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 21:53:27 No. 3173
>>3168 You might be surprised if you looked up a map of worldwide IQ comparisons. There is an astounding amount of 75-90 iq people using the internet.
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 23:02:00 No. 3174 >>3176
>>3172 /pol/ meme? it's from /lit/
Anonymous 08/01/23 (Tue) 23:03:25 No. 3175
I thought it was from the culture warrior Vox Day.
Anonymous 08/02/23 (Wed) 13:17:10 No. 3176 >>3178
>>3174 That's even worse then. At least /pol/ has the excuse of being filled with actual retards.
Anonymous 08/02/23 (Wed) 13:53:13 No. 3177
cumbrain was also a /lit/ meme iirc
Anonymous 08/05/23 (Sat) 07:39:13 No. 3178
>>3176 Its only natural for readers to want have a couple synonyms for psued. The intent is the same, no? Its like the way they use tryhard in a different way than the rest of the internet
Anonymous 08/24/23 (Thu) 14:33:25 No. 3249
>>3160 Shinji's emotional issues are pretty silly as well in my opinion, everybody in the series is written pretty poorly and everything is way too over dramatised.
But that's just my opinion and really that's what views on art are, opinions and they often aren't connected to intelligence at all in fact most often that would be the case as most art is after an emotional response and not a logical one.
Anonymous 08/24/23 (Thu) 14:38:39 No. 3250
third hijack
Anonymous 08/24/23 (Thu) 19:29:32 No. 3265
Its been almost 30 years. Its time to let it go
Anonymous 08/24/23 (Thu) 21:06:14 No. 3267
Is Pripara the evangelion of family anime? (Starting the trend of making it funny for all ages)
Anonymous 08/24/23 (Thu) 21:21:32 No. 3268
It deconstructs aspiring idols better than most - I've known girls that thought they were gonna be pop stars, its more comical than anything
Anonymous 08/24/23 (Thu) 21:42:19 No. 3270
Remember Gekidol? Now that was a wild ride.