>>33110frankly the op attachment is the absolute best i've got, nothing else comes close
others are simply smaller minded, like "the devil uses roman catholicism to spread the worship of ishtar", "the vatican has untold riches stored in their secret underground vaults", and in another i was watching they had looked at a latin chant that said "lucifer" (the original adjective, not the name), this meant they're SATANISTS
it's the perfect mixture of strange practices, piles of technicalities, centuries upon centuries of great political power, and the kind of jank you get when trying to faithfully translate text from two milennia ago for the fiftieth time
there's one i came across several times today about
books being removed for no reason in 1684 so they could covertly modify the narrative and i wouldn't be surprised if someone made up the date by inverting 1984 as a prank, although it seems to be a misunderstanding of apocrypha like by saying KJV invented it i'm honestly not sure because as usual it doesn't have any references
i always laugh when i come across a new explanation of how "no, this isn't a pagan tradition"
religion for breakfast has several videos like it, like for the christmas tree or christmas itself, they're great