No.11013[View All]
If it doesn't fit into a thread, discuss it here.
General Feedback:
https://feedback.kissu.moe/public/forms/Kissu_Satisfaction/4 No.12159
i guess 500? Then if anything persists I suppose it deserves some sort of mod sticky... also the cat thread should probably get a featured slot on the homepage
No.12160
>>12157since kissu is about pushing the bounds of what it means to be an imageboard why not make it so threads never expire
kick ephemerality to the kerb
No.12161
>>12160I think they never do on tohno-chan either
No.12162
>>12160Hmm... the software is good at it but I do worry about hitting limitations when I'm not ready for them...
Well, I'll consider it
No.12163
>>12160i thought this was a joke
No.12165
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
No.12169
>>12168
this isn't the ueno thread
No.12186
Requesting to make the SD bot, that currently joins sageru's #qa and #chatgpt channels, to also join #uru-eru
No.12188
what's uru-eru
No.12189
>>12187>thank youSave that for when you're spared from seeing my nasty prompts because they're in another channel.
No.12190
>>12189If you want to generate stuff so tremendously ugly and offensive you can use something else! You were honest with what you wanted to generate, which I'm thankful for, but using kissu gpu cycles to create ugly offensive stuff that is presumably targeted at other people isn't very nice. I made the merges and someone made the bot and hosted the GPU so people could make fap or fun stuff, not use it to spread further ugliness into the world.
Also this really isn't related to kissu meta, is it?
No.12191
Also your generations are shared to my puush.me account and you can't register for them anymore
No.12193
>>12190>>12191Ok, thank you for answering my implicit question about why you weren't letting me have the channel+bot.
>kissu metaI figured it was close enough because it concerns the administration of Kissu resources.
No.12197
maxed out our space on error logs
No.12198
logsmaxxing
No.12211
>>>/trans/16610
>>>/trans/16611
>>>/trans/16612
Undelete them. They did NOTHING wrong.
No.12292
is coffee good for you?
No.12373
We'll be making a hardware upgrade in 5 minutes. So the site will get restarted.
No.12374
the site will get retarded
No.12381
>>12379It's hard not see this vulnerability as part of some state backed effort to increase possible attack vectors against adversaries. The account that introduced it has been a regular contributor for a couple years and recently a maintainer for xz.
>>12380I've been reading rollback to 5.4.X but there is concerns that older versions could still have malicious code (unrelated to this particular exploit) in them as well due to the length of time the account has been committing to the project.
No.12382
>>12381So we're on the security by obscurity stage.
I don't quite follow what the actual backdoor entails. Is it just a DDoS vector or can randoms log in with root if enabled
No.12383
xz vulnerability only effects people who upgrade to the most modern versions of everything. All my servers are on 5.2
No.12386
>>12385Hello! (and welcome?)
Fast dumb threads go on /jp/ generally. Slower methodical threads of discussion are
usually on /qa/. But, threads can be moved by mods if needed.
No.12399
>>12398no, the persons
headings look brighter than they should be. Something makes dark reds balance with the background into becoming a sort of pink.
I know the guy isn't trolling. I thought it was the OS or browser's dark theme but I can't replicate it.
No.12400
>>12399It's more readable above so they may have some contrast accessibility setting on.
No.12402
he's on windows10 so it might be something there. But he claims that on some browsers it displays normally and on others it's "corrected"
No.12403
So is the gif autoplay something that's sticking around? I didn't see an option to disable it, so I figured it was just a temporary gag but it's still going...
No.12404
do you dislike it? I though it was worth trying to add a bit more stuff to how you can use the site
No.12405
Personally I really dislike it. It reminds me of 8chan spinoffs. I would prefer it be a toggle, if possible.
No.12406
I'll think of turning it off, but existing threads/posts will probably have it since it's built in
No.12407
Auto-gif can easily get annoying when people post gifs with a lot of action. You know, when you have something flashing at you from the corner of the eye. One of the many things I use an adblocker to avoid.
If you ad a checkbox to the file upload for the poster to verify that their gif is not "noisy" (for lack of a better term), then we can probably trust a community like kissu to not abuse it.
No.12408
>>12404Yeah, it's a thing that works okay in chatrooms because it'll be out of view shortly after you see it, but here it tends to distract, either because I'm trying to read the post under it or because I leave the tab open on another monitor and have something dancing in the corner of my eye. It's fun for /secret/ shitposting, but I normally want control over movement the same way I want control over sound.
No.12409
k, it's only applying on /secret/ now
No.12415
>>>/secret/29558I still see this thread in catalog view
No.12417
well, you still see it because it exists but for whatever reason the thread didn't build properly
No.12440
>>12386Sorry for the late reply yup it's my first time here! jp and qa, got it, thanks!