Thinking about buying one of those "Samsung, The Frame 55'' " TVs. There's nothing better of quality. Good speakers and the picture quality is nice too. I watched some kissu yukkuri streams on it before my bro took it away from me.

NameO$L&h)d*_qW}:~27gxbMYD!('o#<Jm♬=TX%9\♤i/Cpj>;.☰GZ\|ea`uwrV?5z@♨K4l8fv^yR⚦ cEP☳Q-,]0Hnk⛂{S+BU⚤tN⚲
Options
Comment
File	Or URL:
Whitelist Token

Video Stream Embedding
Advanced Options	Always Noko Always Sage
Video Timestamp
Captcha Type	Captchouli
Spoiler	Unset Spoiler Image NSFW Image
Password	(For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "

File:C-1731376738346.png (2.11 MB,1500x932)

Anonymous 11/12/24 (Tue) 01:59:45 No.1965

Thinking about buying one of those "Samsung, The Frame 55'' " TVs. There's nothing better of quality.
Good speakers and the picture quality is nice too. I watched some kissu yukkuri streams on it before my bro took it away from me.

Anonymous 11/12/24 (Tue) 02:07:29 No.1968

Maybe I should look into one of these since my sister needs a TV...

Anonymous 11/12/24 (Tue) 02:09:24 No.1969

It's kinda pricey at ~1000for the 2024 model. I'm hoping by the week of the 29th it goes under or there's some deals on older models. I think it's supposed to be wall mounted but all the pictures have stands.

Anonymous 11/12/24 (Tue) 02:14:51 No.1971

File:Magilumiere.Magical.Girls.….jpg (266.66 KB,1920x1080)

>>1969
Does that mean you're buying it for Black Friday/Cyber Monday and you made a thread instead of replying to the Black Friday/Cyber Monday thread I made a few hours ago...

Anonymous 11/12/24 (Tue) 03:53:42 No.1976

>>1971
I am against megathreads

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 02:16:15 No.1986

why get a 55" TV with the dumbest gimmick ever conceived for $1k when you could get a 75" TV without the gimmick for $400?

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 02:24:36 No.1988

File:[DESS]Nichijou_10_1080.BD.….jpg (605.46 KB,1920x1080)

>the picture quality is nice too
>at ~1000for the 2024 model
For anything over 1k I'd sure as hell not be paying for just 'nice'. Kinda have the same mind as >>1986 if the case for it is just the frame design unless there's some unmatched visual quality attached to that.

Even then feel like 1k+ is a hard sell unless I'm swimming in money at the moment.

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 02:58:39 No.1991

>>1986
Because I know it works. Instead of gambling on poor audio quality on a 400$ 75" I can know I get good quality from a 1000$ 55"

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 02:59:57 No.1992

Same deal with >>1953. I can get a cheap laptop that could break or an expensive Apple product I know will be reliable

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 03:13:58 No.1993

File:03e2fc652a0484a81d98254441….jpg (476.6 KB,960x960)

>>1986
>75"
i'm watching at 120" right now with my projector
>>1991
>poor audio quality
any decent studio monitors are better than tv builtin speakers

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 03:17:49 No.1994

Speakers on LCDs suck. They're always down-firing and lack any depth because there's no room for the sound. Even a cheap stereo soundbar will sound better.

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 03:30:20 No.1995

>>1991
get the 75 incher for $400 and you can have $600 spare for audio, which you probably won't even need all of for good quality speakers.

Anonymous 11/13/24 (Wed) 03:49:41 No.1996

>>1995

maybe. Does seem like a cheaper stratargy

Anonymous 11/14/24 (Thu) 13:31:44 No.2000

But how are the colors?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV4F3v3TekU

/maho/ - Magical Circuitboards

New Reply