Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 09:02:27 No. 5423
this is intentionally confusing...
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 10:56:14 No. 5424
this is actually hilarious way to show that tiers voting is distinct from multiple choice or popularity
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 12:50:52 No. 5425
This is more votes than I had expected.
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 17:16:38 No. 5428 >>5429
On a scale from new UI to old UI I'm either voting 0 or 4.
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 17:17:06 No. 5429
>>5428 Or 1? (I don't understand it).
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 19:15:17 No. 5430 >>5434
>>5427 >it's impossible to decipher those results when there's no voter count shown and the results are given as a sum instead of an average. I was going to say that the shape would be the same regardless, but thinking about it... Since the voting is on a scale of 0 to 4, it would make far more sense for the results to be averaged and shown as 0 to 4 as well. It would be nice and fancy to then round to the closest whole number result and show the "sentiment score" as well (pic related):
X <= 0.5 -> Bleh
0.5 < X <= 1.5 -> Meh
1.5 < X <= 2.5 -> Sure
2.5 < X <= 3.5 -> Cool
3.5 < X <= 4 -> Boson
As far as making polls are concerned, it would help to just have an "invert sentiment" button.
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 20:26:22 No. 5431
>>5427 >It's just one of these with a less intuitive interface. It doesn't let you put only one option
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 23:24:33 No. 5432
I understand it but I vote 4 on both options anyway just because I can.
Anonymous 01/06/25 (Mon) 23:55:42 No. 5433
gonna get those vote numbers high as boson
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 03:46:28 No. 5434 >>5439
>>5430 we had a discussion about this in IRC and my opinion that he failed to provide an alternative option to is this:
- The bars on polls are an inherent average
- Being given the raw numbers lets you infer how many people are on a poll
- Averages hide information and require me to add more numbers and graphs to the page decreasing readability
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 03:47:11 No. 5435 >>5437
What he made me agree about was that the voting should be a 1 to 5 since a 1 implies that you voted. However. this means that everything will get a vote
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 03:49:04 No. 5436
We just need to make cool 'I voted' stickers
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 04:26:01 No. 5437 >>5440
>>5435 >However. this means that everything will get a vote that's only a problem with sums, but not averages
as for this
>- Being given the raw numbers lets you infer how many people are on a poll it can let you estimate fairly loosely, but it'll never tell you whether that 12 is from six people voting 2 or three people voting 4
>- Averages hide information and require me to add more numbers and graphs to the page decreasing readability hide what information
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 04:26:54 No. 5438
not him btw
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 04:27:41 No. 5439
>>5434 >The bars on polls are an inherent average An average which does not relate to the options 1:1.
>Being given the raw numbers lets you infer how many people are on a poll Not important. If you think it is, just add a "votes: X" above the poll expiration.
>Averages hide information It increase readability by directly relating the sentiment scores to the result of the poll.
>require me to add more numbers and graphs to the page decreasing readability *Number: yes. Graphs: no. I think pic related is infinitely more readable than "48 vs 68 vs 61 vs 64".
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 04:28:03 No. 5440 >>5441 >>5444
>>5437 I am tired of explaining this to you guys. Shut up. I'm making things behave the way I want and fuck you
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 04:33:31 No. 5441 >>5442
>>5440 if you mean
>>>/chat/229179 then you admit the number of voters is not given
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 04:34:30 No. 5442 >>5443
>>5441 I am fucking tired of this shit. I will ban you in such a way that no one will ever be able to unban you if you keep responding to me
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 04:59:29 No. 5444 >>5445
>>5440 Least dismissive developer.
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 05:07:26 No. 5445
>>5444 I've said my thoughts so many times and it's just back to back people not even trying to have a conversation. When do you think someone has to be dismissive and tell them to stop?
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 05:15:37 No. 5446
i improved the memory of the polls and updated it to 1-5 rankings but I'm not interested in updating the version numbers so whatever, you guys can deal with it how you want or something
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 10:05:25 No. 5447 >>5449
it should go from 1 to 5 instead of 0 to 4 and it should display the average score instead of some weird total and it should let you make a poll with only one row if it's a Likert scale poll and it should be selected via a dropdown with three options instead of a combination of two checkboxes where one of the 4 states of the checkboxes is disallowed by fiat
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 10:15:29 No. 5449 >>5450
>>5447 > 1 to 5 done, but I don't feel like updating the version numbers to cause cache update because the userbase doesn't want features.
>average score I've been over this. Averages are not good for polls.
> only one row I would but the userbase does not want features.
> combination of two checkboxes Sure, when someone actually uses the feature
Anonymous 01/07/25 (Tue) 10:30:09 No. 5450
>>5449 >done, but I don't feel like updating the version numbers to cause cache update because the userbase doesn't want features. dumb argumentative shitposter
>I've been over this. Averages are not good for polls. dumb argumentative shitposter
>I would but the userbase does not want features. dumb argumentative shitposter
>Sure, when someone actually uses the feature dumb argumentative shitposter