No.121915
does your fern pawn have a large and soft tummy
No.121916
¥ paying $70 for a video game
I am loling, even lmaoing
No.121918
i cant make a new game
how do i start a new game
No.121919
>>121918that will be $1.99 please
No.121924
>>121916Video game prices are actually kind of good when you think of inflation. There were NES games were like $50-60 and SNES games could reach $70 or more. Although, back then you had a nice cart and booklet and could resell it if you wanted so it's not a 1:1 comparison. I think a major game having the $70 price tag will be a test to see how the prices are moving forward. They'd certainly sell more if it was $50, so will the extra $20 for fewer customers make up for it?
I would have bought it instantly if it was $50, but at this price point I really have to wait and see what people are saying and how long it is and even then it's a tough sell.
No.121925
>>121924That is a very blunt axe.
No.121926
>>121924It's not a test, publishers already decided to make that the standard and are pushing to normalize the new price point with consumers. They know you don't have a choice if you want to play their big titles and will make excuses like "oh, actually these prices are good because inflation" to justify letting yourself get screwed over. It's the same shit as OP going "oh, well the predatory mtx aren't a reason not to buy the game because all their games have predatory mtx". Every time you cave, you ensure they'll do it again.
No.121927
>>121926>They know you don't have a choice if you want to play their big titlesin this case you can get quite a discount on key shops
No.121928
>>121926>the predatory mtxThat's where you take and twist my words to misinterpret my meaning. The mtx in this are NOT predatory and in no way does the game show a design choice to make the purchasable currency meaningfully rare or time consuming to procure such that the label of 'predatory' would apply. What they are, are a kuso attachment by the publisher as a stupid tax for people that want to play the game with their wallets rather than actually playing. Everything advertised as dlc besides the dumb DS2 style "improved starter weapons" are easily attainable ingame. I don't like it so I'm not buying it, but the obvious thing here is that there are people that buy them in all the other games that Capcom's put it into such that they keep doing it.
No.121929
>>121922thank you for the info
anyway this intro guy looks so tarded hehe
No.121930
>>121928You're right, it's fine to give the publishers your money because it's just the publishers who are trying to nickel and dime their customers! Besides, only dumb kids are stupid enough to actually pay extra money beyond the extra $10 they added to the base game, so they're not actually preying on anyone!
No.121932
>>121928People like you are the reason the video game industry has gone to shit.
You have to boycott it and not support these people who hate you, wanting to take your money and all that.
No.121933
>>121932I do boycott all predatory mtx games, but I don't consider the mtx in this predatory. Go fuck yourself I'm not gonna prostrate myself to you and not play a fun game because of morals I don't agree with. I don't play P2W mmos, I don't play gacha, I don't play mobile games. I have a standard for what I won't support in general and this doesn't cross that line.
No.121935
>>121933Which is to not to say I'll support the mtx, but the game is not harmed because of them.
No.121953
I already lost two tardpawns to the water before even reaching the city. Is that a lore thing that they don't have a self preservation instinct? And I can't figure out how to "truck" and "pedestal" (I looked those terms up) the camera in photo mode.
>>121937yeah, but things don't get any less uncool just because they are to be expected. In Monster Hunter Rise I had a flippin BUY THIS CONTENT banner on the title screen once and to add insult to injury it was a super low resolution image too. So yeah Monster Hunter is worse. But that doesn't mean I'm cool with this.
No.121970
>>121934Calling someone a retard for buying into the hype machine so much that they overlook the glaring problems with a game is not slacktivism.
No.122068
>>121970Yeah the performance issues suck, but the game's fun.
No.122142
>>122072¥instant pool of bloodThose sharks sure are fast
No.122144
game is extremely fun if you're able to run it
No.122228
>>122217Capcom put a second layer of DRM in their games now explicitly to prevent modding of any sort. I'm pretty sure it got cracked right away, but they obviously want to make it as hard as possible. I think I did see another spite mod that re-added the ability to make 140cm pawns like the trailer showed.
No.122249
>>122228The culture is really shifting toward a "you can use our products in this specific manner, and only until we tell you to stop" bad-end.
No.122307
>>122300I've uh... just been doing Warrior...
Planning to try everything else after going into NG+ though.
No.122313
>>121916>assuming anon didnt pirate itunless its unpiratable somehow
any is is dd1 good? dd2 looks fun but i cant play games out of order it bothers my ocd
No.122316
>>122308bathing with fern......
No.122317
>>122313yes dd1 is great fun
No.122656
>>122655Wearing armor is not cute.
No.122657
>>122655That warfarer vocation looks so cool... Think I might have to max out everything to achieve the most of it
No.122659
>>122656I see, you are the one my pawns spoke of, the arisen who sprints through the woods in naught but their undergarments