No.9473
It's on. It doesn't work
No.9474
>Whenever the CSAM Tool finds a match to known CSAM on your zone, it will submit reports to NCMEC on your behalf using your NCMEC CyberTipline credentials. If you do not have credentials, you can request them by emailing [email protected]. Visit the NCMEC website for more detailsnvm. they added more steps since I last looked at ti
No.9478
K I sent them an email
No.9479
>>9474finds a match to known CSAM
Bet they have PB's of CSAM.
No.9483
>>9479Indeed, and I bet they circulate it too
No.9484
Don't think OP is here to talk, but I appreciate what he did.
Yeah, unfortunately it doesn't seem to do much. It's possible that it's preventing something, but if it is then it must be something everyone uses because when you see one appear on one board you'll see it pop up on others at the same time.
It does at least demonstrate to your host that you've taken a stance against the illegal spam, but its actual efficacy at anything else is questionable.
No.9487
>>9484it's more important for 4taba, and if we switch to a single server rather than two. The CSAM issue is one of my bigger concerns with maintaining 4taba in the future
No.9488
cloudflare already has a stranglehold over enough of the net don't you think?
No.9489
>>9488They offer a useful service.
No.9494
>>9488cloudflare provides the site multiple levels of defence against hackers and spammers
No.9495
>>9488this is one of their rackets
No.10150
I don't care so much about the "person" in question, but this post in the happenings thread alongside a dip in spam has me curious as to whether the proxy service in question was being utilized by these spammers to post on imageboards.
>>>/qa/92179What really makes me curious is that for the most part all of the IPs associated with the spam were Russian.
No.10151
>>10150Yeah, it seems like a quite a coincidence if not. I was expecting a dip after the war, but it didn't really happen. This, however, yeah, it seems like it took a hit.
No.10730
172.105.196.212
102.223.45.90
74.201.73.194
79.161.20.215
92.223.105.164
185.90.57.221
49.228.177.167
[Gap]
77.48.134.10
201.48.2.11
91.90.120.10
42.118.81.166
...
If you want to find a pattern that can be used to find where these ips are coming from that'd be helpful and maybe useful for finding who's spamming.
No.10733
well, maybe there's a specific provider that can be contacted
No.10734
>>10730I've seen and banned these guys on another site:
>79.161.20.215>185.90.57.221>77.48.134.10and I rangebanned all of 49.228.0.0/16 after getting spam from two different IPs from that ISP.
Probably just random infected computers.