[ home / bans / all ] [ qa / jp ] [ spg ] [ f / ec ] [ b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new / tab ]

/qa/ - Questions and Answers

Questions and Answers about QA

New Reply

Options
Comment
File
Whitelist Token
Spoiler
Password (For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "


[Return] [Bottom] [Catalog]

File:image.jpeg (52.47 KB,388x600)

 No.112850[View All]

Has anyone read academic works on otaku? The ME!ME!ME! poll made me think about how there are actual dedicated academic analyses of the phenomenon, like this book which seems pretty interesting, as opposed to simple media satires. Though I guess this sort of cultural analysis might not be interesting if you're already in the culture it's talking about.
114 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.113042

>>113031
>You ignore the writers mentioned above such as
No I don't...
Shall I quote myself then shall I?
>I'm not saying no Mangaka would say the same thing and you have posted creatives that do

The writers I was ignoring were those like >>113017 who as I said, is just a screen writer.
I'm not moving the goal posts to Managa just saying that most anime is based on a manga and not the creation of the director or producer themself so the producer's own inspirations don't play into it.
It probably would affect manga more than it does anime simply because there is so much more manga than anime and a lot of it never gets animated and the diversity of manga means that more kinds of story are told than in anime.

I'm only bringing up public opinion because it's all the other guy seems to care about while at the same time it seems it's not even in his favour. Says it's as controversial as you like, it's still a survey and the only one brought up. And no Survey is perfect anyway, as I even said.

What I meant regarding Shakespeareian influence was in reference to today's writers, not those of the past. What I was saying was that many modern wirers will praise him and claim inspiration from him but their works don't reflect that and are nothing like his. Maybe I should have spent more time explaining that but I assumed the context would make it obvious what I meant.

 No.113062

File:[Coalgirls]_Occult_Academy….jpg (141.91 KB,1280x720)

>>113031
If Shakespeare is so "influential" *rolls eyes*, why doesn't anyone write in iambic pentameter anymore?

 No.113063

>>113062
I think we should bring it back and also utilize onomatopoeia more, a friend of mine was listening to a saudi football match and it was interesting to me how Arabic seems to have multiple forms of speaking depending on what the intent of something being said is and English feels limited compared to many in that regard

 No.113064

Is there any writing on disabled otaku?

 No.113074

Awareness rate of Evangelion among Japanese in their 10s and 20s (sample size 2,169):
>79.2% (10s)
>73.2% (20s)
https://lab.testee.co/2021z_trend23/

Awaremess rate of Evangelion among ages 15-79 (sample size 1,200):
>65%
Nippon Research Center survey (2020)

Agency of Cultural Affairs (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) top anime poll (sample size 80,402):
>1. Neon Genesis Evangelion
https://web.archive.org/web/20061030110322/http://plaza.bunka.go.jp/hundred/bumon_anime.html

Best-selling TV anime physical media of the 20th century (initial release only):
>1. Neon Genesis Evangelion 111,783
>2. Dragon Ball GT 31,696
>3. Kidou Senkan Nadesico 29,488
someanithing data

Best-selling TV anime physical media of all time:
>1. Neon Genesis Evangelion 234,919
>2. Uma Musume: Pretty Derby Season 2 196,859
>3. Bakemonogatari 112,434
someanithing data

Estimated awareness rate of Evangelion:
>56.98% (age 15-79)
>over 99.5 (age 20-35)
>7th highest for all anime
https://jp.知名度.net/detail/%E6%96%B0%E4%B8%96%E7%B4%80%E3%82%A8%E3%83%B4%E3%82%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B2%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AA%E3%83%B3

 No.113075

>>113064
yeah, just read this thread

 No.113076

>>113074
Dragonball GT??????????????¿

 No.113077

i think kaguya lovewar would have outsold all of those domestically. Probably Free had higher sales.

Likely Oshi no Ko outsold these figures too based on how heavy it was advertised. Also chainsawman is a thing

 No.113078

>>113075
Evangelion sperging is just a tribute to everything moot did for the western anime community

 No.113079

And let's also throw in One Piece. There's no more recognized anime today than One Piece.

 No.113080

>>113077
Kaguya sold under 5k, Free 30k, Chainsaw Man sold so bad that MAPPA complained. These are physical media sales.

 No.113081

>>113079
Eh, OP is more known as a manga, "anchoring" SJ if you will (I'm sorry)

 No.113082

>>113080
Can you stop being a schizophrenic/bipolar tard for a single day?

 No.113083

>>113082
Don't shoot the messenger, them's the numbers

 No.113084

>>113082
At least they're not a cluster B if you're telling the truth

 No.113085

If you don't shut up for 24 hours you're going to "win" the debate.

"One Piece
By August 2022, it had over 516.6 million copies in circulation in 61 countries and regions worldwide, making it the best-selling manga series in history"
If you tell me that Eva has more influence on animation and japanese culture than dragonball or Onepiece you will be banned until your mania flips back to depression.

 No.113086

I think the real reason people object so much to EVA is because it reminds them of their adolescent regrets

 No.113087

Look at the anime made today.
They're either romcoma or battle tournaments. Where is your victorious psychological mecha series which has changed the landscape??? It's no where. No one gives a shit about mecha and the psychological aspect of japanese media dates back to the 1900s.

Seriously.

 No.113088

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 No.113089

>>113087
I'd argue 1700s

 No.113091

>>113089
yeah, but I wasn't sure when those stories were written

 No.113093

>>113087
Nobody cares about mecha because there's nothing left to do with Real Robot, especially after Planet With and Super Robot is niche and more appealing to Kaiju and toku fans than general sci-fi fans

 No.113097

>>113082
wat
>>113085
oh i see
projection(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

 No.113098

grats. your perma sticky is now perma saged.

 No.113127

i'm just gonna leave this here
http://library.lol/main/E079481C831AA6B2312330149958F3C6
¥What is Sekai-kei? Post-Eva Otaku History (2010)
can't read jap myself and the text is oriented incorrectly, but it's still interesting

 No.113133

>>113086
My problem with it is that it's boring and overly dramatic. It often comes across too much like 3d drama even to the point of being absurd, I actually burst out laughing when the science lady professed her love to Shinji's dad.

>>113087
Mecha still exists and there is still a lot of it being made.

 No.113134

>>113127
It seems there is a western article that cites this and other japanese stuff that may be useful: https://fansconference.org/dRuZ33A/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/SekaikeiArticlePhoenixPapers2015.pdf

 No.113160

>>113086
honestly i just hate both of the endings
how do you get two chances to fix your ending and then manage to ruin both of them lol
a̶l̶s̶o̶ ̶i̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶n̶k̶ ̶d̶i̶s̶c̶u̶s̶s̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶s̶u̶r̶r̶o̶u̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶s̶h̶o̶w̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶i̶n̶s̶u̶f̶f̶e̶r̶a̶b̶l̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶i̶ ̶h̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶t̶a̶l̶k̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶w̶i̶t̶h̶ ̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶p̶e̶o̶p̶l̶e̶,̶ ̶i̶ ̶e̶s̶p̶e̶c̶i̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶h̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶d̶u̶m̶b̶ ̶v̶i̶d̶e̶o̶ ̶e̶s̶s̶a̶y̶ ̶t̶a̶l̶k̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶p̶o̶i̶n̶t̶s̶ ̶p̶e̶o̶p̶l̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶g̶u̶r̶g̶i̶t̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶h̶o̶w̶ ̶p̶e̶o̶p̶l̶e̶ ̶t̶a̶l̶k̶ ̶a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶h̶o̶w̶ ̶i̶t̶'̶s̶ ̶a̶c̶t̶u̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶A̶G̶A̶I̶N̶S̶T̶ ̶o̶t̶a̶k̶u̶ ̶c̶u̶l̶t̶u̶r̶e̶,̶ ̶b̶u̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶'̶s̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶s̶h̶o̶w̶'̶s̶ ̶f̶a̶u̶l̶t̶
i thought the first 20 or so episodes were cool

 No.113176

>>113160
If its really as inspired by gundam as people say, I like to think its making fun of Amuro letting trauma run his life for many years. If not, its probably about how those afflicted with personality disorders are doomed to unhappiness

 No.113181

File:1445228967711.jpg (38.19 KB,400x529)

>>113085
There aren't a whole lot of pirate odyssey stories being made, are there? In any case, by this metric you're just agreeing with >>113074, it's the exact same argument.
But, if you want to learn about why you're wrong, go ahead and keep reading. I dare you, you aspie.

>>113134
Yes, actually, that's very useful and I appreciate it, thank you. It uses the same sources as the Jap wiki article and then some, is way more thorough in its analysis, and then spends the latter half of the article detailing uncontroversial cases of sekai-kei.

The one that stands out to me the most is the "removal of a larger social context." Concretely, compared to something like Gundam (I believe Ideon to a lesser extent?), where there's war, there's politics, and the enemy is perfectly understandable, Eva has an apolitical organization isolated from any government, facing a handful of bizarre and incomprehensible abstract aliens that no one can communicate with, much weirder than your regular kaijuu. When the country's electric supply is diverted to power up the positron sniper rifle, there are no comments made on how it affects the rest of the country, how it impacts society, it's barely shown at all. It's entirely about the fight and the few people then and there, it's about Rei's smile.

Without society in play, there's a much bigger focus on the subject, and the "sekai" part is how their inner feelings, inner world is extended to be as important as the world itself even as it's about to end or going through some massive crisis. That's what the critics say, not me, I'm not making this up. There's more stuff to it, like a romance between a fighting bishoujo and a powerless MC, a relatively static daily life even admist the crisis, and other things, you should read it yourself. It's a better explanation than I expected, honestly. The genre is stated to have lasted until the late 2000s (with a brief revival in Madoka, I read elsewhere).

One of the examples universally given as "definitive sekai-kei" is Hoshi no Koe, coincidentally a psychological mecha focused on the relationship between a sentou bishoujo (who's busy fighting mute aliens) and a powerless dude, authored by none other than Makoto Shinkai, the mega blockbuster dude that makes original anime movies! There it is, there you have it! Fuck, its very first line of dialogue starts with a contemplation on what sekai is, precisely what the label makes fun of, then towards the end she has a conversation with an externalized herself, and it features zero other characters outside of those two. Even the Jap wiki says Shinkai makes sekai-kei. This discussion is officially over, anchor is superfluous, thank you very much mina-sama.

Buuuuut, not so fast. Let's go all the way back to Azuma's database book mentioned in >>112861. Turns out he's immensely influential, I keep seeing references to him all over. This actually surprised me, because when I picked up the book I found him mentioning Eva dozens of times, directly linking it to a new type of otaku from a third generation. I take this to be the 第3次アニメブーム >>112945 was talking about.
Azuma makes the point in characterizing the old Gundam fanbase as people who were looking for a traditional narrative, versus Eva fans who "did not really have a concern for the entire world of Evangelion," and which basically only cared about the setting insofar as it allowed them "to empathize with the story’s protagonist, to draw erotic illustrations of the heroine, and to build enormous robot figures." This fits in very well with the social criteria previously given for sekai-kei. Furthermore:
>This shift clearly appears again not only on the side of the consumers or the creators of derivative works but also from the point of view of the original creators.
>The first television broadcast of Gundam in 1979 was followed by several well-known sequels. Most of those were developed along the lines of a single fictitious history under the supervision of the general director, Tomino Yoshiyuki. In the case of Evangelion, however, there were no sequels and no plans to make sequels.
>Instead, the original creator’s production company, Gainax, developed the derivative works sold in the Comic Market and at the same time created plans for related concepts; for instance, there are mahjong games, erotic telephone card designs using the Evangelion characters, and even simulation games in which players nurture the heroine Ayanami Rei.
Obviously this had a huge impact on how merchandise and multimedia works operated. It gets to the point that "One might argue that the original TV series of Evangelion continued to function as an entry into the database, if not into a grand narrative." There is also a note that reads:
>it was with the boom of interest in the anime series Neon Genesis Evangelion in 1995–96, and the franchise is spawned, that otaku culture transcended the confines of cult-like fandom to become a mass social phenomenon.
Of course, part of the database and its postmodernism in Azuma's terms is greatly tied to the creation of derivative works, which blur the line between the original and everything after it. This circles all the way back to the TV ending's fan reaction as mentioned by Saitō and quoted in >>112895.

Later on, about Rei and her clones:
>The emergence of Ayanami Rei did not influence many authors so much as change the rules of the moe-elements sustaining otaku culture. As a result, even those authors who were not deliberately thinking of Evangelion unconsciously began to produce characters closely resembling Rei, using newly registered moe-elements (quiet personality, blue hair, white skin, mysterious power).
Interestingly enough, throughout the whole book he seems kind of disgusted with otaku culture in general, or at least that's what it seemed like to me. His arguments make it look like its logical outcome is gacha as we know it today, which I don't disagree with. But that's a topic for another day, I'd rather stop for now.


Had to read another hundred pages for this, but I think it's comprehensive enough. Gotta say, I learned a lot. Hope it proves satisfactory for everyone involved, as a companion to the previously shared opinions of creators, statistics on the series' reach, and how it became the highest-selling TV anime of all time by an incredibly large margin (nearly twice that of the second spot, the original Gundam, and with quintuple average yearly sales) in just four years. Satisfactory for everyone except you, V. You should go buy a bucket of chum bait and choke on it, dumbass. Bakayarou. Aho.

 No.113189

>>113181
Great post, but you're incorrectly assuming that everyone who participates in discussions like this is interested in learning more about the subculture, and as we can see from this thread that's hardly true. Lots of people are perfectly content limiting the extent of their involvement with otaku culture to torrenting anime, reading scanlations on mangadex and saving images from danbooru. And that's fine really, I just wish they had enough self-awareness and humility to realize how that also heavily limits their perspective.

 No.113191

>>113189
I'll be honest: at first I was fairly skeptical of this stuff. It was a grand claim, I wasn't informed about it at all, and there's nothing more polarizing than Eva. Fragments of quotes and data points are the conspiratard's weapons of choice, so it's easy to distrust, especially when dealing with a language that's so often as badly translated as Jap is. I assume this is a widely shared attitude. Professional sources with a cohesive message in English are what worked for me, and judging from the replies pre-2nd-derailment, they work for others too.
Anyways, couldn't have done this without you. Not sure I'd even heard of sekai-kei before this thread. Thank you, genuinely.

 No.113196

Nobody ever gets disgusted by otaku culture for the correct reason: turning consumerism into an identity if not religion

 No.113199

>>113196
typically the ones that make that point are commies but since consumerism is a totally pervasive thing they'd rather talk about other stuff

 No.113205

>>113074
Those statistics are fairly similar to >>112951

Also EVA is not the highest selling anime any more, that's Uma Musume now.

 No.113206

>>113181
It's far from satisfactory for me as well. In fact all you are doing is wasting a lot of words to bring up a small subgenre already mentioned.

As for Rei, I disagree with that as well as that archetype existed before Rei and Rei is not even a very good example of it. Rei is more of a 'broken experimental creation' archetype and they usually don't even have blue hair they usually have grey or white hair.

>>113196
I don't really see an issue with it. But then of course I am biased in this as I myself buy a lot of Otaku merchandise.

Also from an economic perspective consumerism is good, particularly consumerism of this kind as it's a highly value added industry and it's also heavily tied into the service economy which is what most developed economies revolve around.
And it benefits the companies producing anime as well so that's good too.

 No.113220

>>113199
There are few subcultures as ruggedly capitalist as actual, local aniotas. I really doubt this level of consumerism is as pervasive in most other subcultures aside from maybe sports fandom (although I guess it depends on the sport), beauty, western Disney fandom and of course any hobby based around collecting. I will give otaku worldwide this though, they're the only one of the group I've seen justify it, even happening in this thread. This isn't surprising as the Japanese tend to lean right but I respect it, as most people tend to be like "Yeah, it is but I'm not that far gone/that bad" etc.
I've even seen a post here suggesting that anime was a NATO operation to make young people less likely to support china

 No.113237

>>113206
I just can't see why I should take your word over that of a dozen Japanese experts who lived through it. It's said so matter-of-factly that you'd need some extreme evidence to take this denial seriously.
Like when you say "wasting" even though it's three short paragraphs glossing over most of a 37 pages long article, going against explicit statements, and ignoring the middle part completely. It's a blunt display of bias from your part.

 No.113238

>>113237
No no, you don't understand, you still haven't disproven the very real possibility that all of these people are wrong/lying/conspiring, and that a random imageboard monolingual is more credible and knowledgeable than all of them.

 No.113239

>>113237
I have already replied to those quotes, if you do not want to engage with what I have said then that is on you. And repeating the appeal to authority fallacy does not help.

Which middle part am I supposed to be missing that you think is so important? If it looks like I am ignoring stuff, I'm not I just don't have the energy to reply to everything you write paragraph by paragraph when I have either already addressed it or don't see it as important. If you feel that I have missed something important that has not been addressed then point it out, claiming that I have ignored it but not saying what it is and calling me biased does not actually help in any way.

>>113238
When you say things like that all it does is make you look like you've lost.

 No.113240

>>113239
What is there to lose? It's a discussion, and most people participating in it seem to be actually interested in learning and sharing knowledge.

 No.113241

>>113239
At this point there's only one thing left for me to say: sigh.

 No.113242

>>113240
Maybe lost was phrasing it the wrong way.

But anyway how is >>113238 either a discussion or anything that would display an interest in learning or sharing knowledge?

 No.113251

reminder that authorities exist for a reason
relying on them isn't automatically fallacious

 No.113261

In Japan it's different OK, but in the UK academics writing about (local!) subcultures have a spotty history albeit usually not out of malice! You have to understand the skepticism somewhat right?

 No.113262

>>113251
It depends on how you use them.
It becomes a fallacy when the fact that they are an authority is your argument in and of itself.

 No.113263

they certainly trump paranoia

 No.113264

Unless it is Red China, where the authorities promote paranoia

 No.113265

It's a fallacy when said authority doesn't have relevant expertise in the field you're talking about. Thinking the opinions of authorities with relevant expertise are not worth more than any other opinion just because authorities are fallible is also fallacious thinking.

 No.113267

>>113265
That's a fallacy too but not the fallacy in question.




[Return] [Top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]

[ home / bans / all ] [ qa / jp ] [ spg ] [ f / ec ] [ b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new / tab ]